
When the institution responsible for defending women’s rights fails to embody these principles itself, the credibility of its action is called into question. The current debate raises serious questions about the coherence between stated missions and administrative practices.
The defense of women’s rights cannot be limited to speeches or symbolic initiatives without real impact. It must translate into concrete decisions respecting the constitutional quota and promoting real female participation in spaces of power.
According to the press release, the Minister for Women’s Affairs, Pedrica Saint-Jean, allegedly played a role in a decision that led to the dismissal of a female director general. This situation reportedly resulted in her replacement by a man, despite the availability of competent female profiles within the administration.
This decision is presented as having further reduced women’s presence in director general positions. Out of 18 ministries, only three women reportedly hold such positions today, highlighting a worrying regression.
In this context, the signatories believe that the state must demonstrate its commitment through transparent and consistent actions. Without this, the promotion of gender equality risks remaining a declarative principle without real application in public governance.
